Abstract
Materials that possess the ability to self-heal cracks at room temperature, akin to living organisms, are highly sought after. However, achieving crack self-healing in inorganic materials, particularly with covalent bonds, presents a great challenge and often necessitates high temperatures and considerable atomic diffusion. Here we conducted a quantitative evaluation of the room-temperature self-healing behaviour of a fractured nanotwinned diamond composite, revealing that the self-healing properties of the composite stem from both the formation of nanoscale diamond osteoblasts comprising sp2- and sp3-hybridized carbon atoms at the fractured surfaces, and the atomic interaction transition from repulsion to attraction when the two fractured surfaces come into close proximity. The self-healing process resulted in a remarkable recovery of approximately 34% in tensile strength for the nanotwinned diamond composite. This discovery sheds light on the self-healing capability of nanostructured diamond, offering valuable insights for future research endeavours aimed at enhancing the toughness and durability of brittle ceramic materials.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.
Change history
13 October 2023
In the version of the article initially published the incorrect version of the Supplementary information was included. This has now been updated in the HTML version of the article.
References
Dry, C. Procedures developed for self-repair of polymer matrix composite materials. Compos. Struct. 35, 263–269 (1996).
White, S. R. et al. Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 409, 794–797 (2001).
Urban, M. W. et al. Key-and-lock commodity self-healing copolymers. Science 362, 220–225 (2018).
Liu, J. et al. Tough supramolecular polymer networks with extreme stretchability and fast room-temperature self-healing. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605325 (2017).
Li, C. H. et al. A highly stretchable autonomous self-healing elastomer. Nat. Chem. 8, 618–624 (2016).
Hu, K. & Olsen, B. R. Osteoblast-derived VEGF regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation during bone repair. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 509–526 (2016).
Willenborg, S. & Eming, S. A. Cellular networks in wound healing. Science 362, 891–892 (2018).
Yang, H. J., Pei, Y. T. & De Hosson, J. T. M. Oxide-scale growth on Cr2AlC ceramic and its consequence for self-healing. Scr. Mater. 69, 203–206 (2013).
Chen, G., Zhang, R., Zhang, X., Zhao, L. & Han, W. Oxidation-induced crack healing in Zr2Al4C5 ceramic. Mater. Des. 30, 3602–3607 (2009).
Burnworth, M. et al. Optically healable supramolecular polymers. Nature 472, 334–337 (2011).
Corten, C. C. & Urban, M. W. Repairing polymers using oscillating magnetic field. Adv. Mater. 21, 5011–5015 (2009).
Li, B., Cao, P. F., Saito, T. & Sokolov, A. P. Intrinsically self-healing polymers: from mechanistic insight to current challenges. Chem. Rev. 123, 701–735 (2023).
Lange, F. F. & Radford, K. C. Healing of surface cracks in polycrystalline Al2O3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 53, 420–421 (1970).
Osada, T., Nakao, W., Takahashi, K., Ando, K. & Saito, S. Strength recovery behavior of machined Al2O3/SiC nano-composite ceramics by crack-healing. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 3261–3267 (2007).
Zhang, L., Bailey, J. B., Subramanian, R. H., Groisman, A. & Tezcan, F. A. Hyperexpandable, self-healing macromolecular crystals with integrated polymer networks. Nature 557, 86–91 (2018).
Yanagisawa, Y., Nan, Y., Okuro, K. & Aida, T. Mechanically robust, readily repairable polymers via tailored noncovalent cross-linking. Science 359, 72–76 (2018).
Ying, H., Zhang, Y. & Cheng, J. Dynamic urea bond for the design of reversible and self-healing polymers. Nat. Commun. 5, 3218 (2014).
Wang, B. et al. Mechanically assisted self-healing of ultrathin gold nanowires. Small 14, 1704085 (2018).
Nakao, W. et al. Self-crack-healing behavior of mullite/SiC particle/SiC whisker multi-composites and potential use for ceramic springs. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 1352–1357 (2006).
Jin, T. et al. Mechanical polishing of ultrahard nanotwinned diamond via transition into hard sp2-sp3 amorphous carbon. Carbon 161, 1–6 (2020).
Zeng, Z. et al. Preservation of high-pressure volatiles in nanostructured diamond capsules. Nature 608, 513–517 (2022).
Sumant, A. V., Auciello, O., Liao, M. & Williams, O. A. MEMS/NEMS based on mono-, nano-, and ultrananocrystalline diamond films. MRS Bull. 39, 511–516 (2014).
Bilal, M., Cheng, H., González-González, R. B., Parra-Saldívar, R. & Iqbal, H. M. N. Bio-applications and biotechnological applications of nanodiamonds. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 15, 6175–6189 (2021).
Handschuh-Wang, S. et al. Corrosion resistant functional diamond coatings for reliable interfacing of liquid metal with solid metals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 40891–40900 (2020).
Field, J. E. & Freeman, C. J. Strength and fracture properties of diamond. Philos. Mag. A 43, 595–618 (1981).
Dang, C. et al. Achieving large uniform tensile elasticity in microfabricated diamond. Science 371, 76–78 (2021).
Nie, A. et al. Direct observation of room-temperature dislocation plasticity in diamond. Matter 2, 1222–1232 (2020).
Regan, B. et al. Plastic deformation of single-crystal diamond nanopillars. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906458 (2020).
Bu, Y., Wang, P., Nie, A. & Wang, H. Room-temperature plasticity in diamond. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 32–36 (2021).
Yue, Y. et al. Hierarchically structured diamond composite with exceptional toughness. Nature 582, 370–374 (2020).
Fuller, J. & An, Q. Room-temperature plastic deformation in diamond nanopillars. Matter 2, 1082–1084 (2020).
Leonesio, R. B. Fracture and healing effects in mica crystals. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 55, 437–439 (1972).
Gaines, G. L. & Tabor, D. Surface adhesion and elastic properties of mica. Nature 178, 1304–1305 (1956).
Li, F. et al. Dual-phase super-strong and elastic ceramic. ACS Nano 13, 4191–4198 (2019).
Yoon, J. K. et al. Enhanced bone repair by guided osteoblast recruitment using topographically defined implant. Tissue Eng. A 22, 654–664 (2016).
Chou, C. T., Gaur, U. & Miller, B. Fracture mechanisms during fiber pull-out for carbon-fiber-reinforced thermosetting composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 48, 307–316 (1993).
Bruley, J., Williams, D. B., Cuomo, J. J. & Pappas, D. P. Quantitative near-edge structure analysis of diamond-like carbon in the electron microscope using a two-window method. J. Microsc. 180, 22–32 (1995).
Hu, M. et al. Compressed glassy carbon: an ultrastrong and elastic interpenetrating graphene network. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603213 (2017).
Shang, Y. et al. Ultrahard bulk amorphous carbon from collapsed fullerene. Nature 599, 599–604 (2021).
Tang, H. et al. Synthesis of paracrystalline diamond. Nature 599, 605–610 (2021).
Zhang, S. et al. Discovery of carbon-based strongest and hardest amorphous material. Natl Sci. Rev. 9, nwab140 (2022).
Gressus, C. L. et al. Charging phenomena on insulating materials: mechanisms and applications. Scanning 12, 203–210 (1990).
Liu, L. et al. Controllable reversibility of an sp2 to sp3 transition of a single wall nanotube under the manipulation of an AFM tip: a nanoscale electromechanical switch? Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4950–4953 (2000).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P. et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671–6687 (1992).
Chadi, D. J. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 16, 1746–1747 (1977).
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
Macmillan, N. H. & Kelly, A. On the relationship between ideal tensile strength and surface energy. Mater. Sci. Eng. 10, 139–143 (1972).
Hill, R. The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65, 349–354 (1952).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52288102 to Y.T.; 51922017 and 51972009 to Y.Y.; 51532001 to L.G.; 52090020 to Y.T.; 52103322 to Y.G.) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (E2022203109 to B.X.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Y., A.N., L.G. and Y.T. proposed and supervised the project; S.C., Y.G. and T.J. synthesized the ntDC samples; K.Q., J.H., X.L., J.W. and A.N. conducted the in situ tests using SEM and TEM instruments; Q.H., L.L. and Z.Y. performed the simulations; K.Q. and X.L. prepared the sample using a FIB; and Y.Y., Y.T., L.G., B.X., A.N., K.Q., Q.H., L.L., Y.W. and Y.L. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in discussions of the research.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Materials thanks Derek Warner, Ming Dao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 A multicycle tensile fracture test of a ntDC NB (Sample 3) with a width of ~ 220 nm.
a, Sketch configuration of the dual-beam FIB system showing the preparation of the ntDC NB and PTP device on Hysitron Pi-85. The right panel is the enlarged sketch of the 3D geometry, indicating an equilateral rhombus shaped cross-section with an inner angle of 52°. The sample width observed in SEM is actually the height of the equilateral rhombus, ranging from 200 nm to 1000 nm. b−i, Initial tensile fracture test and 1st to 7th healing tests on the ntDC NB. The crack was clearly seen in b−f, as marked with the yellow arrowhead. In the last two healings (h and i), a protrusion appeared at the bottom of the fracture, as marked with the black arrowhead.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Results of multicycle tensile fracture tests of ntDC NBs with different widths.
a−d, Load versus displacement curves taken from the multicycle tensile fracture tests of ntDC NBs with different widths of ~ 300 nm, 400 nm, 500 nm and 1000 nm, respectively. The insets demonstrate the evolution of healing efficiency with multiple fracture and healing duration.
Extended Data Fig. 3 A multicycle tensile fracture test of another ntDC NB with a slightly mismatched crack (Sample 1, with width of ~ 200 nm).
a−f, Initial tensile fracture test and 1st to 5th healing tests of the ntDC NB. When the two fracture ends are in contact, an obvious misalignment is observed, as marked by the yellow arrowhead in b−f. g, The load versus displacement curves taken from the multicycle tensile fracture test. h, The healing efficiency versus healing duration curve. The maximum healing efficiency is approximately 21%.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Experimental setup and in situ tensile fracture test of a ntDC NB in TEM.
a, Photograph of the stretched chip structure based on Bestron double tilt tensile holder. In situ transmission stretching sample is fixed at the position marked by the red circle. b, Low-magnification TEM image of the sample prepared by FIB technology for in situ tensile fracture test in TEM. c to e, TEM images of the NB at moments of before fracture, after fracture, and before recovery, respectively, insets in c and e are SAED patterns taken from the corresponding white circled regions. f, High-resolution TEM image from the boxed region in e just before the recovery of the two fracture ends. Regions of diamond and DOs are labeled. g and h, Atomic-resolution high-resolution TEM images from the blue and yellow boxes in f, respectively, detailing the graphite-like layers at the fracture surfaces.
Extended Data Fig. 5 EELS analysis of the DOs region and a multicycle fracture and healing test showing the region of DOs expands.
a, EELS from the DOs region in comparison with raw glassy carbon and ntDC. The lavender and aqua regions represent 1s-π* and 1s-σ* transitions of carbon, respectively. The DOs show substantially higher fraction of sp2 (at 285 eV) and lower fraction of sp3 (at 292 eV) than those of ntDC, indicating substantial sp2 bonding in DOs. The sp3 content in DO was roughly estimated with raw glassy carbon with the two-windows method using EELS information. For two-windows method, Iπ* and Iσ* were calculated by integrating the intensity over 4 eV (283−287 eV) and 10 eV window (288−298 eV), respectively39. The sp2 ratio was calculated using the equation \({N}_{{int}\,{ratio}}=\frac{{I}_{\pi * }^{{DOs}}/{I}_{\sigma * }^{{DOs}}}{{I}_{\pi * }^{{GC}}/{I}_{\sigma * }^{{GC}}}\) and \({N}_{{int}\,{ratio}}=3x/(4-x)\), where x represents the sp2 fraction38. The estimated content of sp3 in DOs (that is, 1-x) is about 34.5% ± 3.0%. b to d, TEM images of the NB after healing duration of 10 min, 20 min and 30 min before the 1st, 2nd and 3rd healing tests, respectively. The DOs content kept increasing with fracture cycles.
Extended Data Fig. 6 The multicycle tensile fracture test result of a ntDC NB with a width of ~ 200 nm.
a, Load versus displacement curves with different healing duration timing immediately after previous fracture. b, Healing efficiency corresponding to the healing cycle in a.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Multicycle tensile fracture tests of DSC NBs in TEM and SEM.
a and b, TEM snapshots of a rectangular DSC NB along the [100] direction (~ 350 nm in width, 100 nm in thickness and 1500 nm in gauge length). SAED Patterns were taken from circled regions in a and b. c, TEM image taken from the red framed region in b, showing the typical {111} cleavage fracture. The inset is a diagram showing the geometry of two intersecting {111} cleavage surfaces. d to g, TEM images of the fractured surfaces of the DSC NB, taken after the initial tensile fracture and 1st to 3rd healing tests. h to k, HRTEM images from the surface regions in d to g, respectively (insets, corresponding fast Fourier transform images). The single-crystallinity was maintained throughout multicycle fracture and healing, with almost no DOs formed on the surface. l, SEM observations of a DSC NB ( ~ 205 nm in width, along the <100 > ) during the tensile fracture test. m, High magnification SEM image of the fractured ends, showing typical {111} cleavage fracture; n, SEM image of the fractured region after release the load. The inset shows the geometry of two intersecting {111} cleavage surfaces. o, Load versus displacement curves from the multicycle tensile fracture test. p, Healing efficiency versus healing duration of the three DSC NBs with width of ~200 nm along <100 > , <110> and <111> direction.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Total and projected density of states for DSC and diamond slab.
a, Total DOS of DSC. b, Total DOS of the diamond slab containing six (111) layers as mentioned in the method. c, Total DOS of amorphous carbon structure. d, The projected DOS (PDOS) of carbon atoms in DSC. e, PDOS of inner carbon atoms in diamond {111} slab. f, PDOS of surface carbon atoms in diamond (111) slabs.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Variations of energy and force per area with increasing distance between two fractured (001) surfaces of diamond polytypes, as well as those between two DO structures with varying sp3 content.
a and b, 2H diamond. c and d, 4H diamond. e and f, 9 R diamond. g and h, 15 R diamond. i and j, DO structures with a sp3 content of 34.7%. k and l, DO structures with a sp3 content of 63.2%. m and n, DO structures with a sp3 content of 86.1%. o, The maximum repulsive force per area versus sp3 content. The maximum repulsive force per area increases with sp3 content: 5.73 GPa for 34.7% sp3 content, 6.81 GPa for 63.2% sp3 content and 7.86 GPa for 86.1% sp3 content and eventually 12.82 GPa for cubic diamond.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–5 and molecular dynamics simulations.
Supplementary Video 1
The multicycle tensile fracture test on a ntDC NB with a size of 220 nm (sample 3) and the corresponding force versus displacement curve (shown in Fig. 1a–d,f); video speed is 10 times the speed of the experiment.
Supplementary Video 2
In situ observation of the amorphization of diamond and formation of DOs at the fractured surfaces (shown in Fig. 2).
Supplementary Video 3
In situ observations of the dynamic healing process between two disconnected fracture surfaces with DO protrusions (shown in Fig. 3); video speed is 10 times the speed of the experiment.
Supplementary Video 4
Molecular dynamics simulation of the self-healing process between two fractured ends of ntDC, showing that there is no diffusion during this self-healing process (shown in Supplementary Fig. 2).
Supplementary Video 5
Molecular dynamics simulation showing the formation of DO phases during the tensile fracture test (shown in Supplementary Fig. 5).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, K., Hou, J., Chen, S. et al. Self-healing of fractured diamond. Nat. Mater. 22, 1317–1323 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01656-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01656-4
This article is cited by
-
Crack this kind of diamond, and it heals itself
Nature (2023)
